Nouveaux défis, nouveaux départs : prochaines étapes dans la coopération européenne au développement


Auteur : Overseas Development Institute

Date : 10 février 2010


La traduction française n'est pas disponible.

 

The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, and the arrival in Brussels of a new leadership team, together provide an opportunity to re-invigorate European collaboration and collective action in the realm of international development. This publication is the result of a collaboration between 25 researchers from four of Europe’s leading think-tanks on international development. It stems from a shared commitment to European development cooperation, and a sense of urgency about the need to rethink policy for new and challenging times. A new Europe, facing new challenges, will be tested in many fields and sectors. The authors assess the task of reaching the Millennium Development Goals, and rethinking the goals for the period beyond 2015. They make the case for joined-up thinking across the institutions and policies of the EU, emphasising the importance of Policy Coherence for Development. And they examine specific policy areas – trade, state/peace-building, climate change, migration, finance, and the private sector. They lay out an agenda for partnership with developing countries, and examine how actors in the EU system can work better together. The report makes the case for five priorities:

 

  • New EU leadership in thinking about how development cooperation can help deal with shared global problems.
  • EU states to meet their aid promises and improve the targeting and effectiveness of aid spending.
  • New efforts to ensure coherence between development and other policies.
  • Providing new life to development partnerships.
  • Improved cooperation between Member States, so that the EU really does work as one.

 

You can read the entire report here.

 

 

Autres langues:


  • Imprimer
  • Flux RSS des commentaires
  • Fermer
    Envoyer cet article
    Send this form
4 commentaires

Che Thuy Nhu

Date : 26 février 2010, 08:55

Dear participants in the FORUM
I read all 94 pages of this Book . Some parts understand to me, some data and graphic are difficult for me.
I see those problems in EU are the same in Asia .But in Asia it seem more serious for example impact of climate change to Asia.
I agree with author in part The world at across roads ( ½ ) that :” Evidence show that human development gains are mutually reinforcing women’s education improves child nutrition, better fed children do better in schools “.
I understand the women education is basis for sustainable development .In Vietnamese have the words “Father died, child eat rice with fish. Mother died children eat leaf in the street “. This sentence in the people life thousands years ago.
-Other idea , I have to think “human development is process of enlarge people choice.”
More choice for people.
-The last idea I agree is EU support private sector in development. In society we have rich and poor, intelligent man and stupid man, health man and ill man … All people , who can’t find jobs in society , they can earn money in family private enterprises .They help each other. This is best way for poor people to save their life. In Vietnam people always came to country side to visit home land and pray. They visit morning and came back afternoon to city .Many of them ask the sisters , brother and mother, father race chickens, plant rice , race pigs … When they came to country side they buy chickens , ducks, pig’s meat ,rice and carry to city .This channel in side family .They help each other
The relations are trade in side family. People from city understand that they help their family in country side.
Thank you for attention

Che Thuy Nhu

Date : 20 février 2010, 04:26

(Continue )
Yeasterday I find the information in Google about vegetable - based Ink.I made summary in Vietnamese and passed it to printers .I think trademarks for eating food have to use this inks
I read to page 17 and I feel my english enough to catch main ideas .
I will came back latter about "commitement to poverty reduction in the world applied across range of policies"
Thank you

Marie

Date : 17 février 2010, 11:27

Tous les efforts de discussion avec la Commission sur le thème du développement semblent n'avoir servi à rien ! La nouvelle Commission Barroso II a encore plus explosé ce sujet que par le passé. Le voisinage se retrouve rattaché à la pré-adhésion, la place de la haute représentante n'est pas clairement définit par rapport au rôle de la DG Développement et le plaidoyer pour plus de liens entre intérêts commerciaux (DG Trade) et politique de coopération au développement est resté lettre morte.
Je me demande également ce que deviendra la relation Afrique-Europe, car le commissaire au développement est letton, la haute responsable anglaise, la commissaire à l'humanitaire roumaine et le commissaire à l'élargissement et au voisinage (sud et est) est tchèque...
Des réflexions, des pistes à ce sujet ?
Any thoughts ?!

Che Thuy Nhu

Date : 16 février 2010, 07:22

Hanoi 16 February 2010
To European Think-Tanks Group
© Overseas Development Institute
I hope that this is not my last comments to yours report .Because this is the time of Lunar New Year All Vietnamese people are meet the Tiger Year 2010. For this event, people in Government have 9 days holidays .They will read when they came back to office. I will forward your publication directly from Id4d Forum to every Email. Let them see all picture of Forum. This FORUM starts at the end of 2007 up to now. It seem useful for orientation to the future for sectors, for policymakers...
To day I would like to inform to you some information about economic relationship between EU and Vietnam. In the past many students were trained in East European countries .Now some countries join to EU. Many olds persons in Vietnam know languages, have friends in EU countries. EU is big export market of Vietnam: seafood, footwear, textile …They import from EU to Vietnam many think and Technology transfer. Now German team is build House for Parliament in Vietnam about 4000 billions VND .It going on.
Understanding EU countries are priorities for many exporters and importers. I will take time to read yours report later ( it seem hard to me because it is very wide areas )
I list the title and fell those problems are the same in Asia : foods, fuel , financial crisis , impact of climate change, Millennium development Goals .
Now in Vietnam big discussion about the way for development after 2010 is going on .In 2011 will Party Congress and we will select new leaders for country .
I think 5 priorities in this report will help Intelligent Society design best way in collaboration with EU in future.
The report makes the case for five priorities:
• New EU leadership in thinking about how development cooperation can help deal with shared global problems.
• EU states to meet their aid promises and improve the targeting and effectiveness of aid
Spending.
• New efforts to ensure coherence between development and other policies.
• Providing new life to development partnerships.
• Improved cooperation between Member States, so that the EU really does work as one.
I believe this report will take attention of official in macro -levels of Vietnam and commercial sector.
Recently time in Vietnam burning the reaction to EU decision apply 10% anti-dumping TAX for footwear export to EU more 15 months . I took talk about this and know that: Vietnam doesn’t have raw materials .They work for foreigners and foreigners sell goods to EU .This is the talk of Investors with exporters to EU under International trading rules. Vietnamese people are out-siding of the talk. Problem is : the salary of women worker about 1,3 millions VND /1 month ( Survey of Ministry of Labor –Invalid and Social affair Vietnam 2009 ) The exchange rate now 1 USD = 18,5 VND ( about ) . This salary include the Insurance ( Social , unemployment and Medical insurance ) for them: In fact they receive about 700.000 to 800.000 VND /1 month. In Vietnam the National standard for poor is 400.000 VND in rural area and 500.000 VND in big city. If women worker have 1 child: you can see this is under National standard for poor .This fact lead me think about: new poor generation with malnutrition and low education levels.
Nick SYD MARTIN from WTO forum advice exporters increasing the price to 10% to avoid the anti-dumping TAX. But I don’t know 10% will go to salary, to children, or it will go to the capital of Investors???
We don’t know how to solve the problems .We hope the Global management Mechanism will find the rules to ensure the women workers can feed 1 child over poor standards.
If apply the International standard 2 USD /per day the situation will be worse.
Thank you for attention and support
Regards
Happy New Year 2010


Note : in the foreword I see the contents. I would have some describtion about re-production of this report
Printed on 80% recycled paper, using vegetable-based inks.

What is the mind vegetable-based inks. ??? Where it can find








Information : les commentaires sont soumis à modération et n’apparaîtront donc qu’après la validation de l’auteur.

Restons en contact

Titre du formulaire d'inscription

Ecrire au webmasterFlux RSS Bookmark and Share Traductions

Actualités

Les rédacteurs

Ces dirigeants d’organisations à vocation internationale mènent une réflexion commune sur les problématiques du développement.

  • Minouche SHAFIK
  • Josette SHEERAN
  • Abdou DIOUF
  • Donald KABERUKA
  • Pascal LAMY
  • Dr Rajendra Kumar PACHAURI
  • Supachai PANITCHPAKDI
  • Achim STEINER
  • António Guterres
  • Invité du blog
  • ID4D (multi-author)

Experts

Partenaires du blog, ces organisations contribuent au blog en partageant leur expertise.

  • Concord
  • Overseas Development Institute
  • Margot Wallström
  • PSE - Paris School of Economics
  • Fondation Chirac
  • Kemal DERVIS
  • Jean-Michel SEVERINO
  • CGD - Center for Global Development
  • Comité Catholique contre la Faim et pour le Développement – Terre Solidaire
  • IPC-IG International Poverty Center
  • The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP)
  • The School of International Relations and Public Affairs
  • GMF - German Marshall Fund - Economic Policy
  • Oxfam
  • Groupe d’Economie Mondiale
  • Columbia University’ s School of International and Public Affaires
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
  • WWF: The Global Conservation Organization

Thèmes

Archives

Liens

Blogroll

Pages les plus lues

Accès partenaires